The City’s Ambitions for Platte Avenue

Photo Credit: Colorado Springs Gazette

Do you live, travel, or have a business along Platte Avenue between I-25 and Powers Blvd? A lot of changes are set to happen if City of Colorado Springs bureaucrats get their way. You see, they have “ambitions” for Platte Avenue.

The specific changes that the city has in mind may or may not be ideal for those of you who will be impacted. We encourage citizens to speak up now, or forever hold your peace.

We’ve seen it over and over again in Colorado Springs. Once the ambitions of a few are fully implemented, it’s hard to right the ship no matter how upset you are.

The Committee

The City of Colorado Springs formed the Platte Avenue Community Advisory Committee, as part of ConnectCOS. Below is a list of people who will be providing input to the committee. These are the people who have a seat at the table to make decisions about Platte Avenue. See if you can spot anyone who will be directly affected —meaning, their business or residence is in the area— by changes to Platte Avenue.

    • Kristine Andrews – COS Airport
    • Cindy Aubrey – Pikes Peak United Way
    • Carrie Bartow – Housing and Building Association of Colorado Springs
    • Rachel Beck – Colorado Springs Chamber & EDC
    • Kate Brady – COS Planning/Bicycle
    • Victoria Chavez – El Paso County Public Works
    • Susan Davies – Trails and Open Space Coalition
    • Spencer Dodge – Front Range Passenger Rail Commission
    • Shane Ferguson – CDOT
    • Jen Furda – University of Colorado at Colorado Springs
    • Jim Godfrey – Pikes Peak Rural Transportation Authority (PPRTA)
    • Chelsea Gondeck – Downtown Partnership
    • Rodney Gullatte – Firma IT Solutions
    • William Harrell – Citizen Transportation Advisory Board (CTAB)
    • Nancy Henjum – COS City Council
    • Mark Hopewell – Active Transportation Advisory Committee
    • Brett Lacey – COS Fire Department
    • Scott Lee – COS Parking Enterprise
    • John Liosatos – Pikes Peak Area Council of Governments (PPACG)
    • Elena Nunez – Colorado Springs Utilities
    • Nicole Odell – Bike Colorado Springs
    • John O’Donnell – Trucking
    • Karen Palus – Parks, Rec and Cultural Services
    • Pat Rigdon – COS Police Department
    • Liz Robertson – Transit Passenger Advisory Committee
    • Joyce Salazar – RISE Coalition
    • Tim Seibert – Nor’wood
    • Paul Spotts – The Independence Center & Community Transit Coalition
    • Sara Voss – Council of Neighborhood Organizations
    • Ann Werner – PPACG DoD Liaison

There are several bicycle-related groups represented on the committee. The city would have us think that cycling considerations are a big deal, but the total number of bike commuters in Colorado Springs is a mere 0.5% of the population—that’s only 5 people out of 1,000. What about the other 995 people who suffer the impacts of road diets to accommodate those 5 guys? So are cyclists the Great Danes in the transportation world, or are they really the Chihuahuas?

Buses, developers, fire and police, United Way, and UCCS are a few other interests that are represented. There is even a representative from the Front Range Passenger Rail Commission. That future boondoggle hasn’t even come to fruition yet, and they have a seat at the table to make important decisions about Platte Avenue. Were you able to spot any residents who actually live in that area, or business owners whose livelihoods are on the line? How about anyone who commutes by car from the Powers corridor? We don’t see any.

The Meeting and Survey

There was a planned Zoom meeting about the changes to the Platte Avenue corridor on December 15th, but that meeting was canceled due to a wind storm disrupting power. Instead, the planners released this video and a request for people to participate in a “community survey”. Here is that request:


The Platte Avenue Corridor Study project team would like your feedback on the identified “ambitions” for each of the four Character Areas along Platte Avenue and to what extent the proposed incremental and transformational alternatives address these ambitions.

Before completing the survey, we recommend watching the public meeting recording linked above. Please note: this survey will remain open to the public until January 31st. Please take a moment to watch the public meeting recording and complete the survey at this link.

You may also copy and paste this link into your browser:

Twice in the email, you’ll see the word “ambitions.” If government using the word “ambitions” doesn’t send chills down your spine, we don’t know what will. It makes us sit up and take notice!

Watch the video and pay careful attention to the new lingo being used by the presenters. They want to reduce automobile traffic lanes between Wahsatch and Cascade. They want to reduce traffic lanes on Boulder Street, too. The presenters were careful to avoid the phrase, “road-dieting” though. Instead, they stuck to what they likely considered more positive lingo to talk about their ambitions and perceived opportunities for the corridor. They used language like:

  • diversity of user types
  • re-allocate space
  • multi-modal
  • enhance the environment for all users

These are the new, gentler phrases to tell you that you’re going to lose traffic lanes in favor of bike lanes. How do you feel about these “ambitions” the city has for you?

What Can You Do?

In addition to watching the above video, make sure to participate in the survey. It’s your neighborhood. It doesn’t belong to CDOT, the parks department, PPRTA, the United Way, or Bike COS.

Nancy Henjum is the District 5 City Councilwoman for the area, and is on the committee. Give her a call at (719) 385-5483 or drop her an email at Pass along your polite comments and concerns. Additionally, share this blog on your local NextDoor site, and to any neighborhood Facebook pages. Get the word out!

3 thoughts on “The City’s Ambitions for Platte Avenue

  1. Great information, Rebecca! So good to know what these road dieters are up to. I do hope that everyone who uses Platte will take a couple of minutes to make their desire to not make downtown more of a nightmare to get through than it already is known to the COS group.

  2. This is the worst possible thing that could happen in Colorado Springs! We don’t have enough roads to handle the commute in this city as it is and you want to decrease what little there is for something that does not get used as it is. Stop this madness and put your heads together to try any figure out how ti increase the roadways.

  3. I will post this on my page as well as Next Door. The most egregious omission in the list of those making this decision is any reference to groups that believe in keeping the character of the old part of the city intact. There are numerous groups which are dedicated to preserving the historic part of the city. I see people whose groups represent unlimited growth to what was a brave little frontier town, loved by and invested in with loving care by General William Palmer, yes the man on the horse. Santa Fe, NM didn’t put the Interstate highway through the center of town and as a result it has retained its classic Western flavor, quaint streets, historic buildings, traditional forms of travel. Since those in power at the time chose to put the Interstate through the center of Colorado Springs, a regrettable decision, this ugliness can be used to take traffic to already established highways north and south of the city center for those wanting to travel east and west. Frankly, I don’t care how fast you want to travel through the center of town.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.